Argentina Follows U.S. Lead, Exits World Health Organization Over Pandemic Policies

Mar, 21 2025

In a bold and surprising move, Argentina declared on February 5, 2025, that it is withdrawing from the World Health Organization (WHO), aligning with the path the United States took under the leadership of former President Donald Trump. This decision comes after sustained disagreements about the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, which Argentine President Javier Milei has openly criticized.

President Milei argued that the WHO-backed strict lockdown measures were among the most bizarre crimes against humanity. He contends these lockdowns were part of a broader attempt at social control during the pandemic — a stance that reflects a significant skepticism towards international health recommendations. According to Milei, these measures not only crippled economies but also infringed on personal freedoms across the globe.

Echoes of Trump's Policies

The decision to sever ties with the WHO places Argentina alongside the US under Donald Trump once more, as it embraces a similar distrust of international bodies. This move is a continuation of the Milei administration's alignment with Trump's ideologies, which prioritize national sovereignty over global cooperation. President Milei has repeatedly emphasized the importance of policy flexibility that doesn’t bow to international pressures.

Despite public health experts warning that this withdrawal may leave Argentina isolated during future health crises, Milei's government seems committed to pursuing a path of independence. The administration has also recently resisted joining the WHO's new pandemic protocol, signaling a decisive turn away from established global health agreements.

Minimal Financial Impact but Potential Global Consequences

Financially, Argentina's departure from the WHO may not significantly impact the organization. Argentina's financial contribution to the WHO was approximately $8.75 million for the period of 2022-2023, and it hasn’t made any voluntary fund contributions of late. Yet, the ramifications of this decision go beyond numbers. Being outside the global health network might limit Argentina’s access to crucial pandemic resources and support in the future.

Furthermore, this development has stirred discussions regarding Argentina's stance on other international treaties, such as the Paris Climate Accord. If the current administration continues to adopt a more isolationist approach, it may reassess its commitments to other significant global agreements, potentially redefining Argentina's role on the world stage.

As the world reflects on Argentina’s choice, it brings to light a broader debate about the balance between national sovereignty and global cooperation in tackling universal challenges. Only time will tell how this decision will play out for Argentina and its place in future global health and environmental policies.